Taj Mahal Central Dome is “NOT” Asymmetrical

-

 Part – 1

                                                                                                                              Date - 8 September

Taj Mahal Central Dome is “NOT” Asymmetrical

- Dr.Ram Bajaj (Structural Engineer)



If the dimension of the central dome of Taj Mahal is taken & calculated wrong – then everything, in the proof of the Central Dome being Asmeymtrical is wrong. The central dome of Taj Mahal is 100% symmetrical.


C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Word\IMG-7710.png

ताजमहल के मुख्य गुमंद (Central Dome) की गोलाई की बनावट में बहुत बड़ा फर्क-मुगल सम्राट शांहजहां से इतनी बड़ी चूक हो ही नहीं सकती।

-डॉ.राम बजाज (Structural Engineer)

C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\Desktop\IMG-7736.JPG 

Dr.Ram Bajaj (Structural Engineer)

General article published in “current science ac.in” by the authors – Dilip R Ahuja and M.B.Rajani. They are in the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India.

C:\Users\TABLE2~1\AppData\Local\Temp\Rar$DR05.212\0996_page-0002.jpg



These experts, on advance studies, have tried their level best to prove the slight inter factions in the symmetry of central dome by the physical experiments on a printed photograph of Taj – taken from anywhere and one that shows part or all of the drum (which is not possible to take from any photograph of Taj). Figure shown in their study.


  1. They have never mentioned the size of the photograph – which is very important in their study because-


  1. One way to establish this fact quantitatively is to take horizontals lies of the dome and measure the two sides across the “central axis”. Figure 2, plots the radius of the two sides of the “outer drum” shown in figure-1 which is the photo of Taj Mahal along with smaller dome of the Taj. How the authors have taken the slices of the drums and plotted on which size of graph? (Standard printed call based graph will not be easily available in the market).  As the size of graph is very important because there are more errors in a small sized graph.


  1. The 'so called' measurements taken of slices are on which calibrated scale of measurement? One cannot measure the length of so cut slices by using normal 10th class standard of scale.


  1. However, the so measured slices – on such scale will have a major error in measurement on the scale of drawing of such photographs on paper graphs as they have the size of a general copy used by the students of class 10th.


  1. What was the “scale of drawing” with reference to the cutting pieces of slices of the photograph?


  1. Conversions of “diameter” & “height of dome” data’s on such scale of graph & measurement by the 10th class standard of scale – will never be accurate on such plotting against various height of dome, meter and radius of outer dome in question for non-symmetry of the central dome.


  1. Authors have explained it like a “craft class” of 6th standard that is 'carefully cut along the boundary' by a ordinary scissors (कैंची) will not give a desirable result (no-not possible) to prove the non-symmetry or imperfections of central dome of Taj Mahal. Take various sizes of photographs of Taj Mahal by small & big scanners. You will find that there are a lot of differences between small photo's compared to bigger photographs.


  1. Remember that the imperfection is the magnitude of “0.92 meter (maximum) at 19.67 meter height” which was highly unacceptable to any Mughal Emperor.

C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Word\IMG-7756.png

  1. Various magnitude of offset shown in the graph at various heights varies from 0.16 meter to 0.92 meter. These figures are alarming in nature and more alarming for any structural engineer because when this is clubbed with the stability of dome – it has certain different meaning and conclusions, as during earthquake or deadly thunderstorm of having wind velocity more than 134KMPH on 1st June 2020 and which had damaged the structure of our Taj Mahal.


  1. When one folds the picture along the “central axis”one will find that the two edges do not concede.


How the authors have come across and found out the central axis of the photographs? The central axis has to be drawn by a thinner carbon pencil of 4H grade with the help of a calibrated protector of engineering standards. The author has not done so.


  1. If you take various sizes of scanned pictures of Taj Mahal and find out the central axis as suggested by the authors you will get different result for different sizes of the bigger and smaller photographs of the Taj Mahal. Then one cannot draw such conclusion on the symmetry of Taj Mahal’s central dome, without proper central axis.




Now we are coming on the most important parts of this concluded asymmetry of the central dome of Taj Mahal


The authors of advanced studies probably must not have the knowledge of the dimentions of the Taj Mahal; otherwise they would have not made such unrealistic mistake, error and manipulation of the data's of the Taj Mahal.




  1. Authors have shown the maximum height of central dome of Taj as 30 meters which it is not? 


cid:193805511806624979021959

                                                                                      Reference & Courtesy: currentscience.ac.in


  1. The authors have calculated the measurements of central dome having cylindrical diameter 31.31 meter at zero meter height as well as at 1.79 meter height (31.31 meter diameter) which is not in actual position.

C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\711TJRXC\IMG-7662.jpg

                                                                                      Reference & Courtesy: currentscience.ac.in


At 19.67 meter height the diameter of drum shown by the author is 24.95 meter which does not concede with actual height at site. Also it bisects at the radius 13.4 meter=26.8 meter diameter, whereas on the smaller diameter at 19.67 meter comes out 12.3 meter equal to 24.6 meter, which also does not concede with actual diameter as well as authors calculation.


  1. The authors have calculated the maximum diameter of dome as 33.62 at 9.24 meter height of dome with having offset 0.42 meter. Which is not available in actual dimension.


C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Word\IMG-7617.jpg

                                                                                            Reference & Courtesy: currentscience.ac.in

The maximum diameter of dome at 9.24 meter height is 33.62 meter having offset 0.42 meter.


  1. Diameter of cylindrical portion at zero height is 31.31 meter which is absolutely wrong, as shown by the Author.


From where these dimensions are received and calculated for such a serious finding? Where is everybody's concern for such unremarkable, un-symmetry of central dome of our Taj.


Now please go through the actual dimensions of the Taj – which is shown here with that the maximum height of the central dome is 24.384 Meter (80ft) and cylinder infernal diameter is 58ft without the thickness of wall.





C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Word\IMG-7793.png                    C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Word\IMG-7792.png

A team member working on the Taj Mahal, standing behind the back portion of Taj Mahal having Yamuna River. (North Side)



C:\Users\TABLE23RNB\Desktop\IMG-7733.JPG

Dr.Ram Bajaj – Structural Engineer on spot at Taj Mahal-analysis at various visits.

Dr.Ram Bajaj & his team of experts on spot at Taj Mahal-analysis at various visits.


Dr.Ram Bajaj

Ph.D,  M.Structural Engineer,

B.E. (Civil Engineering) From 

B.I.T.S, Pilani

M.A. (Economics)

M.A. (Public Admin.) 

M.Com (Fin. Man.) 

L.L.B. 

Diploma In Interior Decoration M.I.E.

F.I.V

Chartered Engineer 

Structural Engineer 

Approved Valuer

Note: Your advise will be highly appreciated.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"प्रकृति ने ताज महल को कुछ ऐसी अदृस्य खुबिया - न्योच्छावर की है कि ताज को कभी भी बदरंग नही होने देगी। परन्तु मुख्य गुमंद पानी के रिसाव के कारण सुरक्षित नहीं रहेगी A.S.I को चेतावनी।" डॉ. राम बजाज

-
Image
 2 August 2021 The Civil Engineering Discovery on Taj-Mahal - World will surprise - Dr. Ram Bajaj Photo Captured by our expert team. The unbelievable Scientific research - which nobody could have - imagined. (1) "प्रकृति ने ताज महल को कुछ ऐसी अदृस्य खुबिया - नन्योच्छावर की है कि ताज को कभी भी बदरंग नही होने देगी।" डॉ. राम बजाज (2) "युमना नदी - ताज महल के निखार के लिए एक बड़ा वरदान हैं।"  डॉ. राम बजाज   Photo Captured by our expert team. (3) "एक अनोखी अदभूद लेकिन आश्चर्यजनक खोज - जिसे कोई भी इंजीनियर समझ नही पाए।" डॉ. राम बजाज                           (4) यह हमारी अद्भुत खोज - उन कोविड -19 Warriors व उन इंसानो को भेंट होगी जिनका जन्म दिवस - 2 अगस्त हैं। (5) The media reports, scientists Environmententalist, Historians, and experts all are most worried about our Taj-Turning green and yellow; because of the environmental condition and air quality, and poor maintenance of our Taj Mahal. Photo Captured by our expert team. (6) More serious nature of problems, we
Read more
-
Image
डा.राम बजाज - अक्टूबर 2021 मानसून   दिनांक - 18 अक्टूबर 2021 समय - सुबह 12 बजे   (1)        13 अक्टूबर 2021 को हमारे मौसम वैज्ञानिको ने विश्लेषण करके घोषणा की थी कि 16 , 17 , 18 अक्टूबर को आधे भारत में मानसून का आगमन होगा-होगा-होगा और करीब चालीस (40) बड़े शहरों व उनके आस-पास के क्षैत्रों में - भारी से अति भारी बारिश होगी।   (2)        हमारा विश्लेषण 100% सटीक निकल रहा है। चालीस (40) शहर जिनके विशेषरूप से नामों का उल्लेख था - लगभग तीस (30) शहरों में मानसून और बारिश का होना आरम्भ हो चुका है - जिनके सबूत के तौर पर देश के अखबारों की कटींग - इस रिपोर्ट के साथ संलग्न है। बाकी बचे हुए शहरों में - आज 18 और 19 अक्टूबर को बारिश होनी ही पड़ेगी - होनी ही पड़ेगी।   (3)        क्या आपके विश्वास में खरा उतरने के और भी सबूत चाहिए ?   (4)        हिन्दुस्तान में - अक्टूबर में मानसून की वापिस का आंकलन - सटीक आंकलन - शहर से शहर के नामों के साथ किसने भी आज तक किया है ? जवाब आपको देना है ?   (5)        आपकी शाबाशी का हमें इंतजार रहेगा। धन्यवाद   नोट : दूसरे Weather चैनल वाले कृपया हमारी नकल करना बंद कर दे। आ
Read more

Warning Report on Taj Mahal by Dr.Ram Bajaj

-
Image
14 सितम्बर 2024 के " इंजीनियर्स"   दिवस पर बधाई हमने मुख्य गुबन्द और ताजमहल में पानी के रिसाव की चेतावनी वर्ष 2021, 2022, 2023 व 2024 में ASI Agra को दे दी थी - अनदेखी की                                            Courtesy: OneIndia.com The Book & Research done by Dr. Ram Bajaj has – given  the awakening calls & warning – warning – warning to the ASI Agra & authority that a serious leakages in the Central Dome and roof of the Taj Mahal – if the serious precautions for its safety and repair will not be taken under the guidance of the experts engineers. Then there is a danger of its safety of Central Dome four minarets & rooms of the basement of Taj Mahal.                                                                                          Courtesy: OneIndia.com Courtesy: OneIndia.com The reasons of these leakages are a scientific engineering reasons and nobody experts has the knowledge to explain - these leakage Scientific & Technically.               
Read more